Skip to content

ORIGINAL SYSTEM DESIGN QUESTION

Device software update rollouts

Roll out signed device updates with staged cohorts and rollback.

Open practice workspace

Original exercise · advanced. Editorial role relevance does not imply a company has asked this question.

Requirements and constraints

  • One million devices; 20 MB update; 10% offline during rollout.
  • Failed updates must not brick devices; rollout health gates must stop expansion.
  • State assumptions and justify security, cost, operational ownership and data retention.

Pressure round

Failure rate increases after the rollout reaches 25%.

Build and explain the design

Requirements & scope

Who uses it? What must it do? What is explicitly out of scope? State latency, durability and privacy goals.

Self-review guidance

Define the actors, required operations and out-of-scope behavior. Explicit requirement: Failed updates must not brick devices; rollout health gates must stop expansion.

Capacity estimates

State assumptions, peak requests/second, data volume and retention. Show your arithmetic and units.

Self-review guidance

Use this workload: One million devices; 20 MB update; 10% offline during rollout. Convert rates and payload sizes into peak compute/storage assumptions; show units, headroom and what remains unmeasured.

APIs & data model

Describe endpoints/events, entity keys, indexes, authorization, and idempotency.

Self-review guidance

Define signed manifests, device versions, cohort assignment and health signals.

Architecture & data flow

Describe components and request/event paths. Use plain text arrows to sketch your design; explain each responsibility.

Self-review guidance

Separate content distribution, rollout control and device recovery partitions.

Failures & observability

What happens on overload, duplicate events, partial failures or lost dependencies? Discuss monitoring and recovery.

Self-review guidance

Pressure-test: Failure rate increases after the rollout reaches 25%. Describe bounded recovery, deduplication, observability and a user-visible failure state.

Tradeoffs & alternatives

Compare two plausible approaches. State the costs, consistency model and what would make you change the design.

Self-review guidance

Compare autonomous rollback with human gates and delayed health evidence.

Design guidance describes assumptions and tradeoffs; no architecture has been simulated or benchmarked.

Practice this question

Save your work privately, explain decisions and return to your revision queue.

Open practice workspaceBrowse the question library →